Some divorcing spouses in Connecticut and elsewhere opt for a hard-ball strategy upon marriage termination. That hardly seems surprising in given cases, especially for couples whose years together were marked by stress and turmoil.
The prototypical divorce of yesteryear in the United States is far removed from legions of more creative and tailored outcomes that are being realized these days.
We note on our website at the proven Connecticut law firm of Berdon, Young & Margolis that our attorneys take "a rational approach to family law."
There are of course myriad factors that can materially contribute to tensions and challenges in the family law universe.
Jeff Landers regularly contributes family law articles to Forbes that tilt toward the perspective of divorcing women. His pieces frequently spotlight dissolution-linked issues relevant to financial matters in high-asset decouplings.
The above-cited reference to a “divorce gap” in today’s blog headline sounds as though it might reasonably be a bit ominous from the female perspective, doesn’t it?
A central point that is repeatedly conveyed concerning divorce in Connecticut and nationally is that every decoupling is unique, presenting its own singular set of opportunities and challenges.
Connecticut courts are amenable to a variety of child custody arrangements in divorce. The guidepost in their decisions is on what best promotes involved children’s interests, and that is decidedly not the same in every case.
Although the below subject matter can apply with equal importance to both divorced men and women, it is the latter demographic we most emphasize in today’s post.
It's pretty clear what is most important when divorce-centered talk turns to custody arrangements and a parenting plan that sets for the particulars.